Cancer is a disease like no other. We cannot compare it with an intruder because it is not an outside "genome" or an uninvited virus. Cancer cells start from within us, and I would dare to say that they are a part of us. They are us. Let's take an example of a person who suffers from a personality disorder. Some days, the individual behaves like their normal self and take care of their health. Some other days however, their disorder takes over, creating another character which attacks his own body. The person becomes an enemy of their own self. That is exactly how I would describe cancer. Likewise, cancer cells are our own cells that have undergone specific modifications.
It is important to
note that our immune system has a mechanism called central tolerance which eliminates
through the process of apoptosis, T and B cell clones before their maturation,
only if they have receptors that recognize antigens (molecules) of the same
organism with an affinity greater than one limit. Basically, this means that
when some cells are produced that seem to deviate from the norm and include
indicators about their abnormality, our system will recognize them and kill
them. However, central tolerance is not infallible, and some self-reactive
lymphocytes escape to the secondary lymph tissues. That is the reason why there
is an additional security mechanism called the peripheral tolerance.
Taking all this
process into consideration, could these or similar mechanisms eliminate
potential cells that are prone to forming cancerous tumors?
NK cells: They
have the ability to attack on any cell in the body that expresses abnormal or
unusual proteins in its cytoplasmic membrane and thus they can destroy some
cancer cells.
CTLs: their
cytotoxic action enables them to destroy cancer cells.
In contrast of what these cells can do, cancer cells
are still able to grow and keep multiplying. That happens because cancer cells
end up being cleverer than NK and CTLs by developing mechanism allowing them to
evade immune responses. Similarly, the
microenvironment surrounding tumor cells suppress the functions of our
tolerance by tricking our immune response resulting in an uncontrolled cancer
growth.
After a lot of observation, a simple question started
spiraling in my head: Do normal cells
“give birth” to a cancerous offspring or the normal cell must first have some
alterations itself, ending up in an between state of normal and non-normal in
order to “create” the next generation of malignant cells? And if so, the in
between state of this cell, could be the reason why it is easy for it to trick
our immune system?
There have been some indicators that prove the
existence of state called transformation. A cell that is transformed appears
with alterations in its morphology. In some cases, this state can make the cell
form tumors. The cell transformation is caused by mutations due to DNA
alkylation agents such as busulfan, cyclophosphamide, dihydroxybusulfan or due to natural
cytotoxic causes like ionizing radiation.
The first stage of the cancerous transformation
consists of genetic mutations and after, the existence of some promoters which
will define the direction of the transcription and will induce cell division
will be the cause of the “produced cancerous offspring”. In a hypothetical
scenario, where a transformative cell exists without its promoters, then there
will be no cancer. Can a gene promoter ignore mutated genes and give the signal
for the transcription to start after these regions? And if these regions are of
outmost importance for the transcription to take place, then could the promoter
or another molecule recognize the changes, and trigger apoptotic signals? Could
we create such signals in the laboratory and insert them in one’s organism in
order for them to detect suspicious transformed cells?
Although I have mentioned it before, some potential ways one’s cells could undergo gene mutations, I must pay attention to the danger of
some viruses. Some cancer types have been confirmed to be caused by a specific
virus, even though some other types {such as leukemias} are considered still to
be the result of an unknown agent. I personally have a belief that most of
the cancer types are generated by a virus either to the person who suffers from
cancer or from one of his ancestors. {This will be discussed in another
article}.
Lets take an example of Simian vacuolating virus 40
(SV40). The virus after entering the human body, has his genome to be incorporated
to the hosts DNA. The SV40 virus codes two prime proteins called large T and
small T and both will initiate the cancerous cells transformation of the cells
that have been infected by SV40.
Some other viruses that are related to carcinogenesis are:
Epstein-Barr, HBV, Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1, Human herpesvirus-8
(HHV-8).
The last two viruses mentioned, are RNA viruses and in
some cases, they contain peculiar genes called oncogenes. Let’s take an example
of the Rous sarcoma virus which includes in its genome a specific oncogene
named v-src.
V-src will code a protein kinase which will
phosphorylate tyrosine residues in proteins. It has been shown that this
process will activate the STAT family which has a very important role in growth
factor, the RAS signal {RAS/MAP is an intracellular
signal molecule that induces cell proliferation and the existence of mutations
in this molecule promote carcinogenesis} also mutations in the RAS molecule are
detected in 30% of ALL and in 15% in MDS. This will result in a constant cell proliferation,
mutations, and abnormalities in chromosomes.
{Could we deactivate the V-src gene in cancer
cells in vivo?}
There have been some indications that oncogenes are
not only produced by viruses. In
particular, Howard Temin, suggested that oncogenes can actually “live” in
healthy cells and actually the virus can take these oncogenes from the host’s
genome. The host’s oncogenes were called
proto-oncogenes or cellular oncogenes. In other words, proto-oncogenes, are
genes which after mutation become oncogenes causing tumor growth. The main
difference between proto-oncogenes and oncogenes is that proto-Oncogene are normal
cells existing in an individual’s genome and they control the cell cycle and the
cell division. They can be proteins regulating cell growth control, growth
factors, growth factor’s receptors, signal transducers, intranuclear agents, regulators
of cell dead. On the other hand, oncogenes are the malicious form of cellular
oncogenes, often being created after mutations caused by ionized radiation,
drugs or viral genome insertion. A oncogene caused by an RNA virus can
contribute to the formation of viral oncogenes while oncogenes created by
mutations and drugs can result in the creation of a modification in their
expression such as overactivated proteins or an increased or decreased
quantities of important factors. Some
examples of proto-oncogenes are the RAS molecules, Myc, Her2. Different kind of
mutations can occur that will transform cellular oncogenes into oncogenes such
as deletions, chromosomal translocations, point mutations, or extra chromosomal
copies of a proto-oncogene.
Additionally, oncogenes have been classified in
different subtypes regarding their role.
Starting off with one type of proto-oncogenes and
their oncogenes which encode proteins that provoke cell proliferation. As a
matter of fact, some of these proteins operate as growth factors or their
receptors. One example of such oncogenes is the SIS oncogene of simian sarcoma
virus (SSV) which can be found in the human malignant glioma. SIS will encode a
form of platelets growth factor PDFG. Similarly, the erbB gene will
encode a growth factors receptor, homologous to the EGF receptor. As it
is expected, this inaccurate and different encoding of homologous growth factor
or its receptor can result in an uncontrollable proliferation of the cell
cycle. Furthermore, a constant encoding of transcription factors can end up in
the same unrepressed growth.
Another type of proto-oncogenes are the ones called
tumor suppressor genes, reducing the cell division’s speed by slowing it down.
They operate with a negative regulation by encoding proteins that will stop the
division, as well as trigger apoptosis when it is needed. Equally important is
their role in repairing DNA mistakes. If tumor suppressor genes do not work
according to their regulations or if they get deactivated DNA is more prone to
mistakes, apoptosis is being avoided and cells can grow uncontrollably. A great
example to such case, could be the retinoblastoma which is caused by the inheritance
of a mutated allele. If the normal allele gets deactivated, then tumor cells will
start occurring.
Moving on to the third classification of cellular
oncogenes, we have genes holding the responsibility for apoptosis. These
specific genes, encode proteins which either can activate or deactivate the
process. Apoptosis is a function of extreme importance for our wellbeing. It is
the way which the body is able to get rid of the unwanted cells. Not only aged
cells can slowly die but also, it prevents from tumor formation and is crucial in
immune processes, such as the development of tolerance and the destruction of
target cells by cytotoxic T cells or by natural killer cells. For example, when
lymphocytes continue to be activated by an antigen, the messages received
during activation inhibit the corresponding apoptotic messages. As antigen
levels decrease, apoptosis inhibition signals fade and lymphocytes begin to die.
If cytotoxic cells do not die through apoptosis when they should, they will
start attacking on the normal cells creating autoimmune disorders. An
anti-apoptotic gene called bcl-2 which
is an oncogenic gene often found in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This gene gets
activated after a chromosomal translocation t(14;18). Lastly, a correlation was
found between bcl-2 and Epstein bar since the virus seems to have a homologous
gene which can function with a similar way and induce the apoptosis. Do we
know if this similar virus gene existed prior to bcl-2 or it is a confirmation
of Howard Temin’s theory where a virus can get its oncogenes from the hosts
genome?
In conclusion, one can say that cancer is a part of us that followed the wrong way. It seems that malignant tumors are not easy to be killed without killing us too. If cancer was triggered by a virus, an atomic bomb which affected near areas with people’s genes undergoing mutations and then inheriting it to their offspring or some specific medications then we could say that it is indeed say that it is an invader that lives silently within us until it suddenly takes its toll. However, could cancer exist without any of these? To be a sincere malfunction of our own cells?
Sources :
-My own notes
-The book : Kuby Immunology
-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547849/
-https://www.nature.com/articles/1203912
-https://www.wikigenes.org/e/mesh/e/19312.html
-https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/proto-oncogenes-to-oncogenes-to-cancer-883/